Free Shipping

You have no items in your shopping cart.


What's the Difference Part 3

Posted on October 17, 2008 by chris ballinger There have been 4 comment(s)

Today I want to take a look at tricks where the entire deck turns blank except for a selected card. We are going to focus on tricks that use full decks today and save the similar packet effects (Tricks using on a small number of cards) for another time.

Point Blank by Jordan Cotler:
A card is selected and the entire deck changes into blank cards leaving the selection as the only printed card.

Point Blank

Strengths: This is the easiest of the three tricks in this article. Simple, to the point and resets instantly.
Weaknesses: The cards are not examinable at the end of the effect. This might not bother some people, but if you've ever had an unruly spectator grab your props, this is a scary drawback.

Erazer by Adrian Gower:
This is more of a Brainwave effect than the other two. A card is named and it is shown to be face-up and to have a different colored back, and to be the only card with printing on the face.


Strengths: Well, it's got that different color back thing that the other two effects don't have and it's got a fun routine.
Weaknesses: This is a good trick, but some people consider it to be overkill. The thought-of-self-flipping-color-changing-only-unblank-card effect scares away a couple of magicians, but audiences seem to like it. The biggest weakness on my opinion is that there is some verbal forcing involved. They can kind of name any card in the deck. That's why I recommend this trick to people that have a bit of experience in mentalism.

Blizzard by Dean Dill:
This is probably my favorite gimmicked card trick. Someone literally names any card (no force) and this card is removed from the deck. You do some stuff with the card and then show that it is the only card in the whole deck with printing on it.


Strengths: The Spectator can name ANY card. The beautiful ending to the trick is matched only by the fact that everything can be examined.
Weaknesses: This one takes some nerve to pull off. The first time I read the instructions I was like, "I'm going to get caught every time I do this." But, the very bold (yet easy) sleight fools them every time.

This post was posted in Uncategorized

4 Responses to What's the Difference Part 3

  • joel
    joel says:

    Please make a whats the differince for your rope routines,thanks

    Posted on October 20, 2008 at 8:05 am

  • joel again
    joel again says:

    egzamples sorry about my writing. Fiber optics,fraid knot,optical ropes,professors nightmare pro, thanks again

    Posted on October 20, 2008 at 8:13 am

  • Chris Ballinger

    That's a good idea. I'll work on that this week.

    Posted on October 21, 2008 at 6:02 am

  • evan samples
    evan samples says:

    you need to make the good tricks easyer

    Posted on November 3, 2008 at 6:16 am